服务业开放阻碍制造业就业了吗:基于行业异质性的视角
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F740

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金青年项目“团队断层视角下研发团队人才评价机制重构与创新绩效持续提升路径研究”(19CGL028);河南省社会科学界联合会调研课题“河南高校毕业生就业问题研究”(SKL-2023-423);河南省大中专院校就业创业研究课题“高校毕业生就业结构性矛盾及应对机制研究”(JYB2023001);郑州市社会科学调研课题“郑州打造青年就业创业主战场对策研究”(ZSLX20230702);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(1233300001)。


Has the opening of the service sector hindered manufacturing employment:A perspective based on industry heterogeneity
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用2000—2021年中国进出口数据和制造业行业数据,构建服务业开放水平指标,使用Bartik工具变量、PSM-DID等方法实证检验服务业开放对制造业不同行业就业规模和就业结构的影响和机制。研究表明:〖JP2〗第一,服务业开放显著促进了制造业就业规模的提升,但在就业结构上,服务业开放对劳动密集型行业产生就业创造效应,同时对资本密集型行业产生就业破坏效应,从而造成了制造业就业极化现象;第二,服务业开放通过技术溢出和成本节约两种效应提升制造业的就业规模,也正是这两种效应在制造业不同行业中的作用机制差异造成了就业极化。研究结论对保持制造业份额基本稳定、促进两业融合和加快构建新发展格局具有一定政策借鉴意义。

    Abstract:

    Using Chinese import and export data and manufacturing industry data from 2000-2021, this paper constructs indicators of the level of services liberalization and empirically examines the effects and mechanisms of services liberalization on employment size and employment structure in different manufacturing industries using Bartik instrumental variables, PSM-DID, and other methods. The study shows that, firstly, service sector opening significantly contributes to the increase of employment scale in manufacturing industry, but in terms of employment structure, service sector opening generates employment creation effect on labor-intensive industries while generating employment destruction effect on capital-intensive industries, thus causing the phenomenon of employment polarization in manufacturing industry; secondly, service sector opening enhances the employment scale in manufacturing industry through two effects of technology spillover and cost saving, and it is Second, the opening up of the service sector increases the employment scale of the manufacturing industry through two effects: technology spillover and cost saving, and it is the difference in the mechanism of these two effects in different manufacturing industries that causes the employment polarization. The conclusions have certain policy implications for maintaining the basic stability of the share of manufacturing, promoting the integration of the two sectors and accelerating the construction of a new development pattern.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

齐文浩,李飚,邱阳.服务业开放阻碍制造业就业了吗:基于行业异质性的视角[J].中国软科学,2023,(12):38-48

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码