职务发明行政管理权权力结构与功能反思
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

DF523

基金项目:


Reflection on administrative power structure and function of service inventions
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    未来科技政策改革应以功能主义界定高校和科研机构职务发明行政管理权。在投资主义原则下,为实现国有资产保值增值,职务发明行政管理权形成法定单向度三级权力结构。这种结构体系容易造成权责关系不清和制度衔接不畅,降低制度稳定性和可预测性。问题根源于,未依功能主义原则对职务发明进行类型化,明确行政管理权的法理基础。因此,未来中国科技政策改革应在功能主义原则下,以国家安全、国家利益和重大社会利益为标准,将职务发明分为非市场化和市场化两种类型。前者利用行政权进行管理,维护国家技术优势。后者采用知识产权法进行规制,以维护社会利益为原则,依据法律、行政法规行使行政管理权,允许自由创设民事规则,推动制度创新。

    Abstract:

    In future, Science and technology policy reform in China clarify the administrative power by functionalism. In order to maintain and increase the value of state-owned assets under the principle of investment, the administrative power of service inventions formed a three-level power structure by law. This structure leaded to the unclear relation between rights and responsibilities and poor linkage with intellectual property law.it reduces institutional stability and predictability. The root of the problem is to clarify the foundation of administrative power by functionalism. Therefore, categorize service inventions by national security, national interests and major social interests. service inventions contain marketization service inventions and non- marketization service inventions. The former uses the administrative power to manage and safeguard the technical superiority of the state. The latter use Intellectual Property Law that permit to create civil rules and restrict administrative power with laws. This way can promote institutional innovation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马波.职务发明行政管理权权力结构与功能反思[J].中国软科学,2024,(12):146-153

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码