标准与专利融合的利益平衡理念及其策略
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D923.43

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金一般项目“技术标准的法治规控研究”(19BFX185);上海市哲学社会科学规划课题项目“人工智能法律治理的标准化嵌入研究”(2024BFX007)。


Concept and strategy of interest balance in the integration of standards and patents
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利益平衡属于标准与专利融合的基础课题,既有理论研究与策略实践并未足够重视。在解析利益相关方的核心诉求与失衡状态基础上,可以将利益平衡理念概括为既确保专利得到适当创新激励,又确保标准得到有效技术扩散,进而增加社会总体福利。依循利益平衡理念,在宏观层面需要推行三大策略:一是立足不同融合阶段采取对应式平衡策略,融合前尽量减少融合机会,融合中着力采用间接融合方式,融合后为标准的有效实施清除障碍;二是区分不同要素类型采取侧重式平衡策略,重点规制公益性强的标准、与标准关系近的专利,以及投机性强的专利权人;三是结合不同规制方式采取递进式平衡策略,遵循“市场优先,法律殿后”的基本方式顺位、“私法→社会法→公法”的法律规范次序,以及“强制协商→慎用禁令→裁断许可费”的诉讼救济步骤。

    Abstract:

    The balance of interests belongs to the basic subject of the integration of standards and patents, and the existing theoretical research and strategic practice have not been paid enough attention. Based on the analysis of the core demands and imbalances of stakeholders, the concept of interest balance can be summarized as ensuring that patents are properly encouraged to innovate, and that standards are effectively technology diffused, thereby increasing the overall social welfare. Following the concept of interest balance, we need to implement three strategies at the macro level: first, based on different integration stages, we should adopt the corresponding balance strategy, minimize the integration opportunities before integration, focus on indirect integration in the integration, and remove obstacles for the effective implementation of standards after integration; The second is to distinguish between different element types and adopt a focused balance strategy, focusing on regulating standards with strong public welfare, patents close to standards, and highly speculative patentees; The third is to adopt a progressive balance strategy in combination with different regulation methods, follow the basic mode of “market first, law behind”, the legal norm order of “private law→social law→public law”, and the litigation relief steps of “compulsory negotiation →prudent use of injunctions→adjudication of license fees”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王庆廷.标准与专利融合的利益平衡理念及其策略[J].中国软科学,2025,(3):205-213

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码