清洁生产审核:企业绿色低碳转型的推手还是掣肘?
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F270-05

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(72321002,72473053,72141302);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(24JZD042,21JZD027)。


Cleaner production audit: a driver or a hindrance to green and low-carbon transition of enterprises?
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    清洁生产审核作为推动企业绿色转型的重要政策工具,其实际效果究竟是“推手”还是“掣肘”,仍需深入探究。基于生态环境部公布的五批“实施强制性清洁生产审核并通过评估验收的重点企业名单”,精确匹配中国重点源污染调查数据库,采用多时点双重差分法研究清洁生产审核在微观层面对减污(污染物减排)、降碳(碳减排)与增效(全要素生产率增长)的影响及其作用机制。结果显示,强制性清洁生产审核能够显著提升企业环境和经济绩效:企业排污强度平均降低1.6%,二氧化碳排放强度下降4.9%,全要素生产率增加8.8%。异质性分析结果显示,清洁生产审核在非资源型城市和非重污染行业的企业中实现了减污降碳增效协同效应,但在资源依赖型城市和重污染行业的企业中未能发挥协同作用。机制检验表明,清洁生产审核通过技术改造和技术创新两条路径实现减排增效。技术改造是短期主导路径,贡献更为直接显著;技术创新虽短期贡献有限,但其减污降碳协同效应与创新补偿经济效益,是企业绿色低碳转型的重要路径。因此,政府应实施差异化清洁生产审核策略,并通过财政补贴及清洁生产示范项目等激励机制,引导企业在生产前端和过程的技术改造与绿色技术创新,推动企业绿色低碳转型。

    Abstract:

    As a key policy instrument for promoting the green transformation of enterprises, the actual effect of the Cleaner Production Audit program—whether it serves as a catalyst or a constraint—requires further investigation. This study utilizes a dataset constructed by precisely matching five cohorts of “Key Enterprises that Implemented Mandatory Cleaner Production Audits and Passed Assessment”, released by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, with China’s Key Pollution Source Survey Database. Employing a staggered difference-in-differences methodology, this study investigates the micro-level impacts of the Mandatory Cleaner Production Audit (MCPA) on pollution abatement, carbon reduction, and efficiency gains, as well as its underlying mechanisms. The findings indicate that MCPA significantly enhances both the environmental and economic performance of firms. On average, the policy leads to a 1.6% reduction in sulfur dioxide emission (SO2) intensity, a 4.9% decrease in carbon dioxide (CO2) emission intensity, and an 8.8% increase in Total Factor Productivity (TFP). The heterogeneity analysis reveals that MCPA achieves a significant synergistic effect—simultaneously reducing pollution, cutting carbon emissions, and increasing efficiency—for firms located in non-resource-based cities and operating in non-heavily polluting industries. However, this synergistic effect is not observed for firms in resource-dependent cities or heavily polluting sectors. An examination of the mechanisms indicates that MCPAs drive emission reductions and efficiency gains through two primary pathways: technological renovation and technological innovation. Technological renovation is the dominant pathway in the short term, offering more direct and significant contributions. Conversely, while the short-term impact of technological innovation is limited, its synergistic “pollution-carbon reduction” effects and the “innovation compensation” economic benefits it generates are crucial for achieving long-term green and low-carbon transformation. Therefore, the government should implement differentiated MCPA strategies. By employing incentive mechanisms such as fiscal subsidies and cleaner production demonstration projects, policymakers can guide firms to focus on technological retrofitting and green innovation at the front-end and throughout the production process, thereby effectively advancing the corporate green and low-carbon transition.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈臻,张玺文,陈林.清洁生产审核:企业绿色低碳转型的推手还是掣肘?[J].中国软科学,2025,(9):140-153

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码