农业转移人口市民化的社会成本及其分担结构:以武汉市为例
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C971

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“农民工市民化的社会成本及其分担机制研究”(21BSH035);华中农业大学自主创新项目“新生代农民工县域市民化问题研究”(2662024WFPY002)。


Social costs of citizenization of agricultural transfer population and their sharing structure
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    农业转移人口市民化的社会成本总量庞大,构建科学合理的成本分担机制是市民化顺利实现的关键。将农业转移人口市民化的社会成本构成分解为个人生计成本、政府公共服务成本、用人单位劳动力再生产的保障性成本3个维度,以成本权责理论归属和现行政策规定为市民化的理论成本测算依据、以政府对常住人口的公共服务投入为实际成本测算依据,选取在调查样本中个体特征为“中间值”的农民工作为全部农民工的典型代表,本文对其市民化成本及其分担结构进行测算分析。测算结果显示,2017—2022年武汉市农民工市民化的人均理论总成本呈逐年上升态势,年均总成本为148 860元,其中个人理论应承担78 346.76元、占比52.59%,政府应承担56 663.76元、占比38.13%,用人单位应承担13 849.51元、占比9.29%。2022年武汉市典型农民工市民化的人均实际投入总成本为83 734.45元,其中个人实际投入成本为32 914.80元、占比39.31%,政府实际投入成本为36 062.05元、占比43.07%,用人单位实际投入成本为14 757.60元、占比17.62%。该年,个人、政府和用人单位实际投入成本的平均达标度分别为37.91%、67.40%、87.72%;市民化人均实际总投入成本的达标度为53.28%。以理论应投额度为衡量标准,市民化社会成本的三方分担主体在实际投入额度上均存在较大缺口,需要通过进一步优化完善市民化公共投入制度、引导激励用人单位强化投入责任、全面赋能农民工个人系统提升其成本分担意愿和能力,建立健全市民化社会成本投入—分担机制,助推新型城镇化和中国式现代化进程。

    Abstract:

    The social cost of agricultural transfer population citizenization is decomposed into three dimensions: individual livelihood costs, government public service costs, and employers’ labor reproduction security costs. This study measures the citizenization costs of typical migrant workers from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Empirical results show that from 2017 to 2022, Wuhan’s migrant worker citizenization incurred a per capita theoretical total cost of 148 860 yuan, with individual, government, and employer shares at 780 346.76 yuan, 56 663.76 yuan, and 13 849.51 yuan respectively. The actual total investment cost for typical migrant workers was 83 734.45 yuan, including 32 914.80 yuan (individual), 36 062.05 yuan (government), and 14 757.60 yuan (employer) in 2022. The actual cost compliance rates were 37.91% (individual), 67.40% (government), 87.72% (employer), with an overall compliance rate of 53.28%. The theoretical cost-sharing structure is 55.25% (individual), 34.05% (government), and 10.70% (employer), while the actual structure is 39.31% (individual), 43.07% (government), and 17.62% (employer). Sensitivity analysis indicates significant sensitivity to income fluctuations but insensitivity to social security contribution base and housing price changes. Current cost-sharing reveals substantial investment gaps across all three parties, with inadequate alignment between actual inputs and theoretical responsibilities. Mobilizing tripartite investment initiatives—particularly enhancing migrant workers’ capacity and willingness to invest—remains critical for advancing citizenization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

熊景维,周舟.农业转移人口市民化的社会成本及其分担结构:以武汉市为例[J].中国软科学,2026,(3):81-94

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码