范式转型与路径建构:高校哲学社会科学实验室建设的国际比较与中国策略
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G647

基金项目:


Paradigm transformation and path construction: International comparison and Chinese strategy of philosophy and social science laboratories construction in universities
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    推动高校哲学社会科学实验室高质量建设,对实现社会科学研究范式转型具有重要战略意义。国外高校社会科学实验室在知识生产方式转型、技术环境迭代、社会需求升级等多重力量作用下,经历了萌芽探索、逐步定型、伦理规范化与跨学科发展、深度交叉融合发展4个阶段,在战略定位、组织架构、资源机制、人才培育及开放合作方面形成可借鉴的经验。我国高校社科实验室的整体建设取得了积极进展,但仍面临定位同质化、治理机制滞后等挑战。加快我国高校社会科学实验室建设,应明确差异化发展定位,优化实验室功能结构;推进制度创新,构建适应交叉研究的治理机制;健全多元投入机制,提升科研韧性与学术自主性;发挥实验室育人功能,培育跨学科复合型人才;拓展国际合作网络,提升学术话语主导权。

    Abstract:

    Promoting the high-quality construction of philosophy and social science laboratories in universities is of great strategic significance for realizing the transformation of social science research paradigm. Under the influence of multiple forces such as the transformation of knowledge production mode, the iteration of technical environment and the upgrading of social needs, the social science laboratories in foreign universities have experienced four stages: embryonic exploration, gradual shaping, ethical standardization and interdisciplinary development, and deep cross-integration development. They have formed referential experience in strategic positioning, organizational structure, resource mechanism, talent cultivation and open cooperation. The overall construction of social science laboratories in universities in China has made positive progress, but it still faces challenges such as homogenization of positioning and lagging governance mechanism. To speed up the construction of social science laboratories in colleges and universities in China, we should clarify the differentiated development orientation and optimize the functional structure of laboratories. Promote institutional innovation and build a governance mechanism that adapts to cross-research; improve the multi-input mechanism, enhance scientific research resilience and academic autonomy; give full play to the function of laboratory education and cultivate interdisciplinary compound talents; expand the international cooperation network and enhance the dominance of academic discourse.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘彦平,常含笑,赵峥.范式转型与路径建构:高校哲学社会科学实验室建设的国际比较与中国策略[J].中国软科学,2026,(4):60-72

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-01
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码