科产融合视角下核心技术转移网络的演化机制与韧性研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F273.1

基金项目:

自治区研究生科研(实践)创新项目“科产融合视角下技术转移网络演化动力研究”(XJ2026G062);国家自然科学基金地区项目“上市公司连锁董事网络结构与投资效率研究”(72062029);国家自然科学基金地区项目“企业政治关联经济后果及金融契约缓解其负向经济影响的研究”(71563051)。


Research on evolution mechanism andresilience ofcore technology transfer network from the perspective of industry-research integration
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    科技创新与产业创新的深度融合(科产融合)是培育新质生产力的核心路径,而关键核心技术的跨界转移则是该融合行为最直观的核心体现。基于2015—2024年中国专利转让数据,本文综合运用LDA主题模型精准识别关键核心技术,创新性地构建了“学研机构—企业”二模网络。在此基础上,运用时间指数随机图模型(TERGM)探究了网络演化的内在机制,并进一步仿真剖析了网络的韧性与底线安全。研究发现:第一,网络演化存在显著的路径依赖与“马太效应”,既有合作基础与供应链关系网络为核心技术跨界流转提供了坚实的信任基础;第二,驱动网络演化的主体因素呈现非对称性,学研机构的“硬实力”与企业的“软实力”是两大关键驱动力;第三,网络演化机制表现出显著的产业异质性,传统产业网络的“核心—边缘”主导性最强,而新兴与未来产业的结构化合作网络尚未发育成熟;第四,技术转移网络存在效率优先与底线安全的结构性错配。虽然马太效应驱动了技术资源向少数核心节点的高效集聚,但也造就了网络极高的结构脆弱性,过度依赖传统产业枢纽使得网络在面临核心节点冲击时极易发生断链风险;在防范极端冲击的韧性表现上,由企业主导的多元合作结构正取代单一学研机构,成为维护跨界技术协同底线安全与产业安全的关键支撑。

    Abstract:

    Integrating Technological Innovation with Industrial Innovation (the“Tech-Industry Integration”) represents the core pathway for cultivating new quality productive forces, and the cross-sectoral transfer of key core technologies is the most direct manifestation of this integration. Using China’s patent assignment data from 2015 to 2024, this paper employs the LDA topic model to precisely identify key core technologies and innovatively constructs a two-mode (“academic-research institutions”and “enterprises”) network. On this basis, we apply the Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (TERGM) to investigate the intrinsic mechanisms of network evolution and further conduct simulations to examine network resilience and bottom-line security. The findings are fourfold. First, the network evolution exhibits significant path dependence and a “Matthew effect”, whereby prior collaboration ties and supply-chain relationships provide a solid trust foundation for cross-sectoral technology flows. Second, the driving factors of network evolution are asymmetrical across agents: the “hard power” of academic-research institutions and the “soft power” of enterprises are the two primary drivers. Third, the evolutionary mechanisms display marked industrial heterogeneity—the “core-periphery” structure is most dominant in traditional industries, whereas structured cooperative networks in emerging and future industries remain underdeveloped. Fourth, while agglomerative evolution entails a high “vulnerability” risk due to over-reliance on a few hubs, in terms of resilience against extreme shocks, enterprise-led diversified cooperative structures are increasingly replacing single academic-research institutions as the key pillar for safeguarding the bottom-line security of cross-sectoral technology coordination and industrial security.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵晓琴,王志睿,孙德华,赵悦辰.科产融合视角下核心技术转移网络的演化机制与韧性研究[J].中国软科学,2026,(9):157-173

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码